Presentation Powerpoint presented March 25, 2014 by Mark R. Waser at the AAAI 2014 Spring Symposium on Implementing Selves with Safe Motivational Systems & Self-Improvement (Palo Alto, CA)
Presentation Powerpoint presented March 24, 2014 by Mark R. Waser at the AAAI 2014 Spring Symposium on Implementing Selves with Safe Motivational Systems & Self-Improvement (Palo Alto, CA)
An intentional “self” is a necessity to answer quandaries ranging from Hume’s is-ought problem to artificial intelligence’s philosophical “frame problem” to questions about meaning and understanding. However, without a good blueprint for that intentionality, the new self could conceivably pose an existential risk for humanity. A critical early design decision is how human-like to make the self, particularly with respect to requiring moral emotions that cannot be self-modified any more than those of humans in order to ensure safety, stability and sociability. We argue that Haidt’s definition of morality – to suppress or regulate selfishness and make cooperative social life possible – can be reliably implemented via a combination of the top-down intentionality to fulfill this requirement and the bottom-up emotional reinforcement to support it. We suggest how a moral utility function can be implemented to quantify and evaluate actions and suggest several additional terms that should help to reign in entities without human restrictions.